Insights

Notes on enterprise technology decisions.

Practical writing on ERP and CRM transformation, Microsoft Dynamics 365, applied AI and business process change — for the people who have to make these calls.

Being straight with youNothing here is published yet. This page shows the editorial plan rather than pretending to a back catalogue we do not have.

Editorial approach

Written by the people doing the work.

There is no shortage of enterprise technology content. Most of it restates a product datasheet at greater length.

What we intend to publish is narrower and, we hope, more useful: the questions that come up repeatedly in scoping conversations, answered properly. What an ERP consultant actually does. How to read a fit-gap report. Which parts of an AX estate genuinely have to be rebuilt. When AI is the wrong tool.

Each piece will be written by a consultant who does this work, and published under their name. Which is also why this page currently lists commissioned topics rather than articles — we would rather show you an empty shelf honestly than fill it with material nobody wrote.

If an article does not change how you would approach a decision, it was not worth publishing.

Editorial plan

What we are writing.

Four subject areas, each building from a foundational piece into more specific supporting articles.

Pillar 01

ERP & CRM transformation

For finance and operations leaders evaluating, replacing or recovering an enterprise system.

What ERP consulting actually covers

Where advisory work ends and implementation begins — and why confusing the two is the most common reason programmes overrun.

CommissionedPillar article

Signs your ERP is the constraint

How to tell whether the problem is the platform, the configuration or the process — before spending money on the wrong one.

CommissionedSupporting

Reading a fit-gap analysis properly

What a fit-gap report tells you, what it leaves out, and the questions to ask before accepting its conclusions.

PlannedSupporting

Business process reengineering in practice

Working through a real redesign: which steps survived, which were removed, and how the decision was made.

PlannedSupporting

Pillar 02

Microsoft Dynamics 365

For organisations implementing, migrating to, or living with D365 Finance & Operations.

Planning an AX to D365 F&O migration

How to assess an AX 2009 or AX 2012 estate, what genuinely has to be rebuilt, and how to sequence the move.

CommissionedPillar article

Configure or extend: the decision that sets your cost base

Why the customisation choices made in the first two months determine what the system costs to own for years.

CommissionedSupporting

What D365 F&O support should include

The difference between a contract that fixes what breaks and one that absorbs change — and what each costs.

PlannedSupporting

Making service updates routine

Building an extension and testing approach that turns Microsoft’s update cycle into a scheduled task rather than a risk event.

PlannedSupporting

Pillar 03

AI & digital transformation

For leaders deciding where AI and automation are genuinely worth applying.

Choosing your first AI use case

A practical test for whether a process is a good candidate for AI — and the signs that it is not, yet.

CommissionedPillar article

Why AI pilots do not reach production

The recurring reasons a promising pilot stalls, and what to establish before starting to avoid them.

CommissionedSupporting

Redesign before you automate

Automation makes a process considerably harder to change. That is an argument for fixing it first.

PlannedSupporting

Preparing an estate for Microsoft Copilot

The permissions and data hygiene work that determines whether a Copilot rollout helps or embarrasses you.

PlannedSupporting

Pillar 04

Enterprise software engineering

For technology leaders weighing build against buy, and managing ageing systems.

Build, buy or configure

A framework for the decision, with the maintenance cost of each option made explicit rather than assumed.

CommissionedPillar article

Modernising without a big-bang replacement

Moving functionality out of a legacy application in stages while it keeps running the business.

PlannedSupporting

Integrations that fail well

Designing interfaces for the day the system at the other end is unavailable — because there will be one.

PlannedSupporting

Reducing key-person risk in software

Practical steps that make a system supportable by someone who did not build it.

PlannedSupporting
How to read the labels. “Commissioned” means a consultant has been assigned and the piece is being drafted. “Planned” means the topic is on the calendar but not yet started. Neither is a published article, and neither carries an author byline until it does. When a piece is published it will appear here with its date, author and full text.

Have a question we should be writing about?

The topics above came out of scoping conversations. If you are wrestling with something that is not on the list, tell us — you will get an answer either way.